Thursday
09Jul

When is something bogus?

Since this website came online I’ve been trying to get an interview with a Chiropractor, or with the Chiropractors Association of Australia, and have failed so far. My first interview with a local chiropractor was cancelled, by them, at the 11th hour yesterday. I’ve got some irons in the fire to get a possible interview, even if by email, and will post about that soon.

In the mean time the ABC Show, Lateline, did a couple of segments on Chiropractors and the BCA vs Simon Singh case that is ongoing now. For anyone who hasn’t been across this, here is a quick run down of the case taken from Science Based Medicine:

Simon Singh is a science journalist who last year wrote an article in the Guardian critical of the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) for promoting chiropractic treatment for certain childhood ailments. Singh characterized these treatments as “bogus” because they lack evidence to back up claims for clinical efficacy. The BCA responded by suing Singh for libel. In the English court system the person being sued for libel is essentially guilty until proven innocent, and even successfully defending oneself can be ruinously expensive. Therefore suing for libel in English court is a very successful strategy for silencing critics.

If you want to watch the Lateline interview with Simon Singh, click here (transcript here). They also have an article, called Chiropractors Defend Practices, which has an interview done by Steve Cannane, who really takes them to task on the matter.

The Chiropractors’ Association of Australia’s released a response to the Lateline segment which you can read here.

Regardless of the outcome of this trial, and the backlash towards keeping libel laws out of science, it’s good that an open discussion is occurring.

Should the BCA and CAA be able to make statements saying they can cure, or help, ADHD, Bed Wetting, Colic, diabete and “birth trauma” when they admit the evidence isn’t really there?  Also of interest is this article, Over Half of Chiropractic Colic Pages Slashed and Burned.  Running scared?

One last quote to finish off, by Australia neurologist Roy Beran; “I think everybody should keep their hands off the neck, personally.”

Wednesday
08Jul

The Baloney Detection Kit 

Here's a great video I stumbled upon today.  Even though it goes for 14 minutes, it's worth watching.

With a sea of information coming at us from all directions, how do we sift out the misinformation and bogus claims, and get to the truth? Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine lays out a "Baloney Detection Kit," ten questions we should ask when encountering a claim.

The Baloney Detection Kit

And mainly for my own reference, here are the ten questions:

1. How reliable is the source of the claim?

2. Does the source make similar claims?

3. Have the claims been verified by somebody else?

4. Does this fit with the way the world works?

5. Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?

6. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?

7. Is the claimant playing by the rules of science?

8. Is the claimant providing positive evidence?

9. Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory?

10. Are personal beliefs driving the claim?

 

Wednesday
08Jul

Wednesdays Collection

Monday
06Jul

Monday Links

Friday
03Jul

Anti-Vaxxers

I was ready to write up a large post on this topic, but found myself getting too angry and not clear headed enough.  So instead I'll link to a great article on it, on The James Randi Educational Foundation website.

That's My Kid Too

The real science is obvious and overwhelming. Vaccines don't cause Autism. Mercury in vaccines didn't cause Autism. Jenny McCarthy's son was vaccinated after mercury was removed from the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine. Autism rates haven't dropped as a result of mercury being removed from vaccines. Autism rates are the same in vaccinated and non-vaccinated kids.

And seeing as though the link in the article doesn't work (remove the dot on the end and it will), I'll link directly to the Jenny McCarthy Bodycount page as well.

Friday
03Jul

Dolphin safe tuna

Great article here from the Southern Fried Science website, simply titled:  The Ecological Disaster that is Dolphin Safe Tuna.

In brief, the way they "used" to fish for tuna was to find large swarms of dolphins, and follow them to where the tuna was.  This worked well (because dolphins are great at finding tuna), but obviously some dolphins were caught, and killed at the same time.  People like dolphins so this wasn't acceptable, and a change was needed.

Now they fish for tuna by leaving floating objects in the sea, which attracts a large variety of fish species including tuna.  This means that less dolphins are killed, but more OTHER sea life is netted at the same time as tuna.  This includes animals that are either endangered, or close to it, like sea turtles and sharks (dolphins aren't and have never been an endangered species).

The simple answer would be to stop eating fish all together, but this is not really a reality for most, as  the author mentions in the comments on the article:

According to the U.N., something like 2 billion people get at least 1/3 of their daily food intake from the sea, and many of these people are desperately poor and don’t have the option to eat something that is more expensive but more sustainable. It doesn’t seem right to me to tell people who have known starvation that they aren’t allowed to eat something.

Food for thought.

Friday
03Jul

The "C" Word

I want to start this post off by admitting two things:  Firstly I have ZERO expertise in this area, and can only go by what I've been told, and what I've read.  Also in no way have I made a decision on this topic, due to my lack of knowledge that would be a stupid thing to do.  So instead I'll post some links that I've found interesting, and maybe promote a discussion?

Chiropractic Manipulation.

First up is Dr Steven Novella's posts from the Science Based Evidence website.

Chiropractic - A Brief Overview.  Part 1 and Part 2

Next up is the section on this subject on the What's The Harm? website, which is very good, but obviously highly anecdotal by design (and a little dated).

Finally let's see what the Chiropractors' Association of Australia have to say about it all, in particular their section on Scope of Care which threw up a lot of red flags to me.  Check it out, make your own mind up.

Friday
03Jul

Save Our Seas

Although I'm still messing around with the formatting, and look, of this site I thought I'd add some content.

The Save Our Seas Foundation have a great website that anyone interested in the plight of our oceans should visit.  They do great work and should be supported.

The Save Our Seas Foundation is committed to preserving our marine environment for future generations. With your help we can and will make a difference.

In particular check out the following two shark videos:

Rethink The Shark

Save Our Sharks

Thursday
02Jul

First Post

This is the first post on my blog, it's just getting used to this site.


Check out the ABOUT ME, section to find out what this site WILL be about.

 

The interface will change, so hopefully next time you come back here it looks nothing like this!